The knife-edge instability
The most striking feature of the Harrod-Domar model is its instability: if the economy departs even slightly from the warranted growth path, it does not self-correct but instead diverges further. Suppose output grows faster than gw. Firms find their capital insufficient to meet demand (capital utilization exceeds the desired ratio), so they invest more aggressively. But higher investment raises income (through the multiplier), which generates even more saving and investment, pushing growth further above the warranted rate. The boom feeds on itself.
Conversely, if growth falls below gw, firms discover they have excess capacity (capital exceeds what is needed for current output). They cut investment, which reduces income, lowers saving, and further depresses growth. The slump deepens. This knife-edge property arises because the model has no built-in stabilizer: the fixed capital-output ratio means there is no price adjustment (no flexible interest rate clearing the loanable-funds market) and no factor substitution to absorb the imbalance. The economy balances on the warranted path like a ball on a razor's edge. This instability motivated Solow's neoclassical growth model, which introduces a variable capital-output ratio through a smooth production function, eliminating the knife-edge.
g>gw⟹excess demand⟹g↑↑ Above-warranted growth generates excess demand for capital, which stimulates further investment and accelerates growth away from equilibrium.
g<gw⟹excess capacity⟹g↓↓ Below-warranted growth creates excess capacity, discouraging investment and deepening the contraction.